CDC Sued for Pushing Illegal 72-Dose Childhood Vaccine Schedule
CDC accused of running an illegal and unconstitutional hyper-vaccination program — never once tested for cumulative safety.
TheLibertyBeacon.com
Given anecdotal reports of what we’ve read about vaccine-injured American children within the school system and how low-functioning they are, we wouldn’t be surprised if this wreckless vaccine program, implemented for the last 35 years or so, wasn’t basically an attack on the US from within. Just like the Covid vaccines would be on all of us much later. Basically, vaccines have been a national security issue all along.
This is an excerpt from the lawsuit, found within a Defender/CHD piece by Michael Nevradakis, linked to below:
“The facts establish a continuing public health outrage hiding in plain sight: America administers more vaccines than any nation on earth while producing the sickest children in the developed world. Yet CDC demands proof of harm while refusing to conduct the studies that could provide it.”
She (lawyer Kim Mack Rosenberg) said: “The schedule is essentially an experiment on our children, and one that becomes increasingly concerning as more shots are added and combination vaccines introduced.”
Here’s a link to the CDC childhood vaccination schedule. It’s truly shocking. If you’re of our age, how many vaccines did you get? Maybe two, three or four in childhood? We recommend looking at Nevradakis’ piece for The Defender, which takes a deeper dive on this lawsuit.
NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH | x.com/NicHulscher
First reported by The Defender, a new federal lawsuit is challenging the CDC’s entire childhood vaccine program.
Filed by Dr. Paul Thomas, Dr. Kenneth P. Stoller, and Stand for Health Freedom, the lawsuit accuses the CDC of recommending 72+ vaccine doses for American children without ever testing the cumulative schedule for safety.
Both doctors previously paid a heavy price for questioning the hyper-vaccination program:
- Dr. Thomas had his license suspended five days after publishing a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study.
- Dr. Stoller lost his license for granting exemptions based on genetic vulnerabilities.
What the Lawsuit Alleges
- No safety testing: Neither the CDC nor FDA has ever studied the long-term, combined effects of the full childhood schedule — despite two decades of warningsfrom the Institute of Medicine (2002, 2013).
- 27 years of silence: By law, HHS must file biennial reports to Congress on vaccine safety efforts. Not a single report has been issued since 1998.
- Constitutional violations: The suit charges the CDC with violating the First Amendment (silencing dissenting doctors), the Fifth Amendment (due process & bodily integrity), and the Administrative Procedure Act (arbitrary and capricious rulemaking).
What Plaintiffs Seek
- Reclassify all childhood vaccines to Category B — shifting to shared decision-making, which would make medical exemptions far easier to obtain.
- Require rigorous safety studies comparing fully vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children before any return to a mandated schedule.
- End retaliation against doctors — protecting physicians who issue exemptions based on individualized medical judgment.
If successful, this lawsuit wouldn’t just expose the unlawful CDC hyper-vaccination program — it would mark a major victory for families seeking vaccine exemptions and for physicians fighting to practice real individualized medicine.
Here’s a video from Dr. Stoller’s YouTube channel that breaks down exactly what this lawsuit is about — the CDC’s rigid exemption policy, the lack of cumulative safety testing, and why the case could change everything for parents and doctors:
Original Article: https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/breaking-cdc-sued-for-pushing-illegal-72-dose-childhood-vaccine-schedule/
Related:
Comments ()