Paul Craig Roberts
It Is No Longer Correct To Refer To Any Western Government As Democratic. Every Western Government Is A Budding Tyranny.
It sounds ridiculous to say, but it is a fact: the era of freedom in the West is over. The false flag attack, 9/11, was used to launch the neoconseratives’ wars in Israel’s behalf in the Middle East. More importantly, fear of “Muslim terrorists” was used to set aside constitutional protections such as habeas corpus and due process and to implement other inroads into liberty such as the Patriot Act and the mass warrantless NSA spying on US citizens. Today you can be arrested in Germany, France, and the UK for waving a Palestinian flag. In the US the exercise of free speech gets you cancelled and fired. Only approved opinions can be safely stated. The facts simply do not matter. Official narratives have triumphed over truth.
This destruction of liberty began a long time ago. I published a book 23 years ago about the transformation of law from a shield of the people into a weapon in the hands of the government which it clearly is as witnessed by the false charges against Trump and the imprisonment of 1,000 people who used their First Amendment right to protest the theft of the 2020 election from President Trump. Hardly anyone believes the charges against Trump, not even the Democrat prosecutors, judges, Justice Department and members of Congress. What is important to them is destroying their hate object. The facts are of no concern. The US is today experiencing Stalinist purge trials. Stalin knew that the Bolsheviks were not capitalist spies and so did the Soviet court system, but Stalin nevertheless had the r Bolshevik leaders executed.
In the US it is not only Democrats calling for more censorship and suppression of the First Amendment. Republicans are just as alienated from freedom as Democrats. Nikki Haley, Tim Scott, even Ron DeSantis are calling for more censorship and curtailments of free speech as a way of suppressing the Palestinian side of the story. The Democrat Left and Republican Right now agree that free speech needs to be reined in, that it can make people uncomfortable, feel threatened, and spread misinformation by departing from official explanations. Left and Right differ on what they want suppressed, but they are both willing to suppress free speech in the interest of their agendas.
The current restrictions on the First Amendment began with “political correctness” in the universities. Some things could be said and others could not. Some races and genders could say them and others could not. Men could be verbally assaulted but not women. Whites could be called names but not blacks.
The orchestrated Covid pandemic brought national censorship. The Covid narrative could not be challenged, not even by distinguished medical scientists. Neither could the Vax. The facts did not matter. Inexpensive preventatives and cures–Ivermectin and HCQ–were prohibited from being used. Consequently, Big Pharma made billions of dollars from a “vaccine” that did not prevent Covid but did have serious side effects–death and permanent health injury for millions of people.
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, the distinguished German human rights activist, has led a large group of medical scientists and attorneys for several years preparing a lawsuit in behalf of the millions of people who died or were injured as a result of the Covid “vaccine.” This has annoyed Big Pharma and their stooges in governments who are complicit in the crime of mandating the injection of billions of people with a substance known to be dangerous and life-threatening.
Efforts to discredit and to silence Dr Fuellmich were soon underway. A judge convicted him last May of insulting people and ordered him to pay a large sum that was reduced to 2,100 euros. Thus, the German court established the principle that free speech can be insulting and punished.
While traveling with his wife in Mexico, their passports were lost or stolen. On October 13 they went to the German embassy in Mexico to have them replaced unaware that a warrant had been issued in Germany for Fuellmich on what appear to be fraudulent fraud charges. According to news reports, Mexico is outside the jurisdiction of the EU and the warrant could not be enforced, so Fuellmich was kidnapped by the German government and flown to Germany and imprisoned. His lawyers have examined the charges of fraud, which seem to amount to stealing the money of his organization and regard the charges as absurd. At time of writing, the only evidence consists of an accusation, possibly a bribed or coerced one.
But Western governments are no longer accountable and can bring all the fraudulent indictments that they wish even against the President of the United States. The purpose of this one seems to be to discredit Fuellmich and prevent his lawsuit from going forward. After being frustrated by the refusal of courts in the Western world to try the Covid case on the collected evidence, a court finally agreed. In my opinion, to prevent accountability for Big Pharma and its government allies, an arrest warrant was issued and Fuellmich was imprisoned.
It appears that today in Germany law is a weapon against truth just as it is believed to have been in Nazi Germany. The German government with its extraordinary suppression of free inquiry, free speech, and protest is rapidly acquiring the characteristics of Nazi Germany, just as has Great Britain with the indefinite imprisonment of Julian Assange in violation of habeas corpus.
Not a Single Court in the Western World Is Willing to Examine the Covid-19 Evidence. “Crimes against Humanity” Revealed by Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
Quite some time ago, in 2021 to be precise, we discussed the remarkable phenomenon of the German-American trial attorney Dr. Reiner Fuellmich and his plans to take the pandemic and its instigators to court. Dr. Fuellmich early on organised a professional investigative committee to gather facts about the galloping pandemic and to elaborate a legal strategy to deal with it in case the evidence convinced the committee that the global upheaval we all experienced was not a natural phenomenon. He was preparing a legal response in case that everything was not on the up and up (in the American meaning of the phrase) as we were being aggressively directed to believe that it was.
At that time, in 2021, we expressed the somewhat sceptical-sounding view that
“with all the facts and cogent arguments marshalled and at his disposal, in today’s post-everything normal and decent world, Dr. Fuellmich will also need, as the title [Viel Gluck, Dr. Fuellmich] suggests, a massive amount of luck, much more than any tool from the arsenal of his legal profession.”
The plandemic was “fueled by an elaborate psychological operation designed to create a constant state of panic among the world’s population.”
“This agenda has been long planned, it’s ultimately unsuccessful, precursor was the swine flu some 12 years ago, and is cooked up by a group of super-rich psychopathic and sociopathic people who hate and fear people at the same time, have no empathy, and are driven by the desire to gain full control over all of us, the people of the world.” (Dr. Reiner Fuellmich)
Perhaps it is time now to review briefly the trajectory of Dr. Fuellmich’s legal case in order to check whether in retrospect our scepticism was warranted.
To start off, two and a half years later, what is the status of the Covid controversy?
To begin with the putative “cure,” the highly touted mRNA vaccines that hundreds of millions of people were relentlessly pressured and in some professional milieux imperatively required to take, their overall harmfulness is now well established. Numerous scientific studies amply confirm it. That proposition seems now to be as close to an open and shut case as anything could be.
One specific scientific study aiming “to investigate possible causal links between COVID-19 vaccine administration and excess death using autopsies and post-mortem analysis” had a very curious or perhaps more accurately, disturbing, fate once it was published by the respected British scientific journal, “Lancet.”
Study authors put a rather bland interpretation of the data in their findings, to the effect that
“the consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine adverse events, their mechanisms, and related excess death, coupled with autopsy confirmation and physician-led death adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death in most cases. Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings.”
The very discreet suggestions, couched in thick scientific jargon, that there could be a cause-and-effect relationship between the purported Covid prevention panacea and excess death was tolerated on the “Lancet” site for exactly 24 hours.
The subsequent explanation posted by the editors is that the
“preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.”
It must be judged very curious that the editors did not notice such a huge and disqualifying flaw when they initially agreed to publish the findings. Or did they receive subsequently a phone call from some higher authority that brooks no contradiction instructing them to immediately remove the tell-tale findings which shake the narrative to its very foundations?
Be that as it may, the problem is that the totality of the many recent rigorously conducted scientific studies about the nature, origin, and “cure” for the pandemic all point to the existence behind it of an agenda that many influential interests involved in the affair would prefer to maintain under wraps.
It is evident that these kind gentlemen and benefactors of mankind are obsessively preoccupied with a single issue, radical population reduction. Can such an objective be achieved in any other way except by killing masses of people?
As private individuals they are certainly entitled to have an opinion on this matter, as Thomas Malthus did also in his time, but there seems to be a very important difference.
Excess population and policies required to deal with it was something that Malthus merely theorised upon. These gentlemen, on the other hand, have the resources and the means, and judging by the plain significance of their own words also the motivation, to give such theoretical ramblings practical effect.
Considering the quantity of victims publicly contemplated by their genocidal (and incidentally highly profitable) schemes and taking into account the global scope of the carnage they have the means as well as the evident intention to accomplish, the Holocaust and what happened to the Armenians, not to mention Srebrenica, are by comparison mere historical footnotes.
Attorney and insurance executive Todd Callender minces no words about it: “Intentional homicide in large numbers is genocide.” It is worth reminding that while machinations that generated excess morbidity on a global scale were going on, the therapeutic use of effective treatments was strictly prohibited.
But what to a normal mind would appear to be if not an open and shut legal case then at least a strong indication of egregious criminal malfeasance, sufficient to warrant an urgent and thorough global investigation, is not necessarily so. Just ask Dr. Fuellmich.
Since we last wrote about it, Dr. Fuellmich’s and his able investigative team’s noble efforts have borne much fruit, everywhere in fact but in a court of law.
Starting out nearly three years ago with laudable but retrospectively naïve enthusiasm, Dr. Fuellmich and his associates have amassed a vast amount of evidence on every aspect of the pandemic, including what is possibly smoking gun proof of malicious intent.
All of that is readily available online, not any longer on YouTube of course, whence he was expelled some time ago like many others who failed to survive the “fact-checking” gauntlet, but certainly on other, more truth-friendly portals where he has since migrated.
The only arena where so far Dr. Fuellmich has had nothing to show for his valiant efforts is his own professional milieu, the court of law.
And that is not because his case is afflicted with paucity of evidence. It is for a different reason altogether that should unsettle everyone who still retains a modicum of faith in what ought to have remained as the last bastion of institutional probity in an otherwise unashamedly corrupt world, the system of justice.
There has so far been not a single court in the Western world that was willing to examine the evidence of colossal turpitude that Dr. Fuellmich has painstakingly uncovered and assembled, that would consent to do its professional duty by hearing his arguments or render a legal judgment on the merits of his extraordinary and impeccably documented claims.
Consequently, there remains little of the confidence Dr. Reiner Fuellmich initially exuded that with the cooperation of our diligent judiciary the culprits for the events that continue to ruin an untold number of lives would surely be rounded up, tried in a court of law, and following a spectacular Nuremberg II would be put away to expiate their crimes.
The expectation that in the real world anything of the sort could actually occur was in itself a spectacular display of naiveté on his part.
So now, properly educated in the ways of the real world, Dr. Fuellmich has had to drop his ambitious vision of a sequel to the Nuremberg Tribunal, having been obliged to settle for a more modest alternative.
He is still holding a trial of sorts, but that has turned out to be a virtual and unofficial exercise carried by the few remaining platforms where truth may still be uttered with impunity.
His efforts therefore will be accessible only to the disenfranchised multitudes who might happen to stumble upon these largely unpublicised proceedings and who will be expected to act in the politically irrelevant capacity of a citizen jury.
Needless to say, the impressions formed by such an informal jury and the conclusions it draws, based on the evidence heard in Dr. Fuellmich’s virtual courtroom, will be of no practical consequence. They will be contemptuously disregarded by the vile cabal upon whose command the editors of “Lancet” hastened to remove from their journal the peer-reviewed findings that could have given the criminal game away.
Arguably, the adamant refusal of the Western judiciaries to investigate the pandemic and render judgment on it after hearing the evidence could roughly be compared to the refusal of Western public agencies to investigate North Stream II.
The parallel with North Stream, however, goes only so far, being deficient in one critical respect. The impact of the event in the Baltic Sea was serious but mainly economic. The impact of the pandemic, including most importantly the“therapeutic” treatments allegedly developed to cure the victims, is on the existential level incomparably more profound, particularly in light of the publicly admitted homicidal motives of its principal promoters. That puts the urgency of looking into the pandemic, its origins, and the objectives it may have been designed to serve in an entirely different league.
Yet be it noted that an experienced international trial lawyer, after many attempts on two continents to initiate legal proceedings which would appear as much in the public interest as anything could ever be, has gotten exactly nowhere.
What does that tell us about the condition of the judiciary in that part of the world which freely lectures the rest of the planet about the benefits of the rule of law and the blessings of a “rules based order”?
Attorney and international freedom advocate Reiner Fuellmich arrested by German authorities
The charges remain unclear at this point, but Fuellmich was the leader of a movement to investigate and prosecute the perpetrators of the Covid bioweapon unleashed upon the world.
Leo Hohmann | Substack
German lawyer Reiner Fuellmich, who had been working on a project known as the Second Nuremburg to hold the originators of the Covid bioweapon plot accountable, was seized over the weekend by German authorities in Mexico where he and his wife had been staying. He was promptly flown to Germany and arrested.
Fuellmich had reportedly lost his passport and scheduled a visit to the German embassy in Tiajuana, Mexico. When he arrived, German authorities were waiting for him and whisked him onto a plane bound for Munich, Germany, where they then arrested him. The exact charges remain unclear as of this post. But please be in prayer for Reiner and his family.
Fuellmich is licensed to practice law in Germany and in the U.S. state of California.
Technocracy.News Editor in Chief Patrick Wood, who has worked in the past with Reiner Fuellmich in getting out the truth about Covid, stated “They lured him into the German embassy in Mexico, where they kidnapped him. He was not arrested in Mexico because there is no extradition treaty (between Mexico and Germany).”
According to an article in Global Research, protests against the German government’s action are being planned by those who support Fuellmich and his work.
Fuellmich heads up the International Crimes Investigative Committee, which is working to unveil the criminality surrounding the release of Covid and the extraordinarily criminal response that engulfed basically every country in the world.
Former president of the Asia Institute, Emanuel Pastreich, stated in an article for Global Research:
“What I do want to stress is that we must unite to support not only him, but thousands of people like him who are standing up against the efforts to turn governments into the puppets of corporations, international banks, and the billionaire class, the parasite class, that lurks behind them. We know that if we do not stop this effort to destroy the rule of law, at every level, to create a separate realm that belongs only to the very wealthy and powerful, that we are guaranteed a global fascistic system which will, if it can, exterminate us in precisely the way that was attempted in Europe in the 1940s.
“I want to also stress that this effort to suppress someone working so hard to enforce the rule of law and to bring the truth to everybody, at precisely the moment that a drive is on to start a world war between Israel and Iran, including the United States, and conceivably many other countries, is no coincidence, but in fact they are parallel.
“One is an effort to force-feed us war as the basis for law, governance, and the economy; and the other is an attempt to destroy all the foundations for the rule of law and for rights for citizens.”
He further stated: “If we cannot name the crimes, if we cannot identify the enemy, there is no way that either beautiful words, or rapid action, can have any possible positive outcome. And we know all too well that these invisible powers have already set up for us a baited gambit, giving us false choices, whether it be between Trump and Biden, or Hamas and Israel …choices which are intended to confuse us and to divide us against each other so that we cannot come together in opposition to this domination of the entire world by the billionaire class.”
Original Article: https://leohohmann.substack.com/p/attorney-and-international-freedom