Poisoning The Well | A Part Of Psyop Strategies | Updated

Dylan Eleven | Truth11.com

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false," ~ Former CIA Director William J. Casey

Lies, propaganda, psy-ops, false narratives, false flag events, staged events, fake enemies, controlled opposition, limited hangouts, and poisoning wells now assisted by AI. This is the environment of disinformation that we must constantly navigate to find the truth. A confusing program set forth by our governments to keep the truth hidden and their desired narrative as the main focus of the sheeple.

The Poisoning Of The Well Concept

Releasing images, video or information that can be proven fake at a later time, with the aim to confuse, and or, discredit other information that is real; using the concept of guilt by association. If one thing is fake, the rest must be also.

Poisoning of the well items try to cover up truths, or cover up for mistakes; as in the case of the Bondi beach crisis actor. Everyone knew right away this guy was a crisis actor. It was called out so much they released a potential AI generated image to poison the well: #1. in the image set below. And possibly #4.

The Bondi beach crisis actor images above:

1) Potentially staged photo or AI generated, to poison the well, but gets the point across fake or not, so it is shared. This image is like a meme, but not 100% obvious it is faked for illustration of the point only, leaving some to believe it is real, which can poison the well when it is proven fake.

Of course it could be real. I asked AI if this was generated by AI and it does not think so. If this is not AI generated, it is such an obvious proof of a crisis actor staged event, so obvious in fact that many will think it is fake, again adding confusion and poisoning the well.

The final alternative is that someone actually took the photo while they were applying the fake blood make up on the crisis actor and released it. It just seems too good to be true.

2) The real photo but obvious crisis actor selfie pose, that everyone automatically called out. A mistake on their behalf.

3) The bandaged crisis actor image with blood covered face. (Another mistake) Paramedics failed to wipe his face, something they probably would have done if he was not a crisis actor needing a photo op. AI also agrees the blood looks fake, applied like make up (see the AI description below).

4) Then the crisis actor in hospital image after the alleged incident, showing clearly no signs of injury at all. Either he was not aware of the camera (unlikely), which is why it is shared, or this too is a poisoning the well image, that can later be proven to be fake to discredit any real information put forth, such as the fact that he was a crisis actor in the first place and they got nailed on it.

The real question is why was a crisis actor added to the Bondi beach shooting in the first place?. Was it an attempt to cement a link between October 7th false flag event, during this real shooting/false flag?. Was the whole event 100% staged?. Or, as was in the case of the Trump faked assassination staged event, a combination of both, where people actually die during a staged event.

No matter what, the fact that there was a crisis actor present adds to the suspicion of the Bondi beach event. As does the predictable narrative that went into overdrive; of ban guns, poor genocidal Israel etc.

Image: Source [Edited]

Related:

I asked ChatGTP if this image A.I. generated? This was the response:

ChatGTP

I can’t be 100% certain, but this image is very likely not AI-generated. It appears to be a real photograph.

Here’s why:

Signs it looks real

• The scene has natural imperfections: uneven lighting, slight motion blur, and realistic depth of field.
• Background elements (stands, chairs, people’s legs) are messy and inconsistent in a way typical of candid photos, not AI.
• The makeup looks like practical special-effects makeup (fake blood, wounds) applied by hand, consistent with film/TV or a training scenario.
• Hands, faces, and objects (brushes, bottles) have correct anatomy and proportions—AI often struggles here.
• No obvious AI artifacts like warped fingers, melted objects, duplicated patterns, or impossible geometry.

What’s actually going on
This looks like:

• A behind-the-scenes photo from a film/TV set, or
• A special-effects makeup demonstration, or
• Possibly a first-aid / trauma simulation (the blood appears staged, not real)

Conclusion
👉 Most likely a real photo, not AI-generated.
If it were AI, it would be unusually clean and coherent compared to typical AI images.

Then I asked if it was edited or staged rather than AI-made

ChatGTP

Here’s a focused breakdown to determine whether this image is staged or edited rather than AI-generated, based only on what’s visible (no metadata).

1. Strong indicators it is staged (intentionally set up)

These are the most convincing clues:

🎭 Special-effects makeup

• The “blood” has a thick, glossy consistency typical of theatrical blood.
• Wounds on the arms and face have clean edges and sculpted shapes, consistent with prosthetics or latex.
• A makeup brush is actively being used on the face → this is a live makeup application, not damage.

🎬 On-set environment

• Lighting stands, tripods, and crew legs are visible in the background.
• The person applying makeup appears equipped like a makeup artist (brushes, kit, kneeling posture).
• Bottles of fake blood are clearly visible on the table in front.

➡️ These details strongly suggest a film/TV set, training exercise, or SFX demo.

2. Signs of minimal or no digital editing

Nothing obvious suggests heavy Photoshop or manipulation:

• No mismatched shadows or lighting inconsistencies.
• Skin texture remains consistent (pores, wrinkles, sweat).
• Blood overlaps clothing and skin naturally without “cut-out” edges.
• No haloing, smearing, or cloning artifacts around wounds.

If editing exists, it’s likely limited to:

• Color correction
• Contrast or saturation adjustment
• Possibly slight sharpening

These are normal for photos and not deceptive.

3. Why it’s almost certainly NOT AI-generated

AI images usually fail in subtle ways—this one doesn’t:

The scene also shows cause-and-effect logic (tools → makeup → result), which AI still struggles to reproduce convincingly.

4. Most likely explanation (ranked)

1. ✅ Staged real photo using special-effects makeup (very likely)
2. ⚪ Lightly edited real photo (possible but minor)
3. ❌ AI-generated image (very unlikely)