Terminate The UN Terrorist World Government Organisation

TapNewsWire.com | Danceaway

Martin Armstrong | ArmstrongEconomics.com

The United Nations is a SERIOUS threat to our future, and not only should the United States withdraw from the UN, it should be thrown out of New York City. The Biden Administration REFUSES to seek peace with Russia and has NO INTENTION of negotiating with Russia. That effectively says the United Nations is just a dog and pony show with no purpose other than to expand its own power as well as its World Health Organization to create its long-term dream of ruling the entire world.

From the very beginning, the United Nations has indulged in self-aggrandizement to elevate itself to the de facto world government. They have been a proponent of tyranny, even using climate change and health that they alone should be in charge. This treaty they just proposed is called the Comprehensive International Convention on Countering the Use of Information and Communications Technologies for Criminal Purposes, pretending this is about cybercrime. Still, it is not – it is about censorship. The UN claims this is the only way to create peace by putting them in charge of the world – unelected, of course. They encouraged this war between the West and Russia because they believed that they could emerge as the Great Peacemaker, which would finally justify their assumption of dominion over the entire world.

This power-hungry United Nations approved its first International Cybercrime Treaty despite significant objections from all the tech companies and human rights groups. This Treaty is HIGHLY DANGEROUS and will tear the world apart and further suppress human rights, which is the objective of the United Nations, just as we are witnessing with all of these hate speech crimes and imprisonment for merely criticizing a government as in Britain and Ireland. This has been part of the World Economic Forum’s 2030 Agenda of world domination. Schwab is a control freak not unlike Joseph Stalin, who launched his great Purge to silence all his critics.

This Treaty will authorize electronic surveillance worldwide in the name of criminal investigations. It abandons every fundamental principle of global human rights, including freedom of speech and expression. It seeks to establish the most expansive jurisdiction for a crime, just as Britain is seeking to extradite an American for criticizing the new Labour Government in Britain.

The United Nations, which is totally UNELECTED, is creating this Treaty as oppression, fully knowing that the clauses it contains are vague and subject to wide interpretation, allowing countries to come up with their own self-serving interpretations to prosecute anything they call a crime that takes place on a computer system internationally. This is intended to silence podcasts worldwide.

Governments know they are losing power. I have warned that historically, they will ALWAYS become authoritarian and tyrannical. Instead of asking why people are becoming angry, they seek to punish them and think that they can intimidate people into being silent economic slaves. A Milan court has ordered a journalist to pay Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni damages of 5,000 euros ($5,465) for making fun of her in a social media post. Free speech is dead. It is only a matter of time before this United National initiative transforms the world into a prison of economic slaves denying any right to express an opinion.

This cybercrime convention is a deliberate effort to silence the entire world. It is most ironic that China and Russia are the two countries that will refuse to honor this tyrannical decree. What does that say for Western culture and values? This treaty will now go to the General Assembly’s 193 member states. If this UNELECTED body of anti-democratic people accepts it by a mere majority, then it will move to the ratification process, in which individual country governments must sign on. Any American representative that agrees to this Treay should be charged with Treason for it violates everything in the Constitution, and there is NO authority to surrender the sovereignty to the United Nations and allow foreign countries to extradite for crimes in their country that violate Constitutional rights in the United States. Britain is hopeless, for the actions of the police under this new Labour government have sealed the fate of Great Britain to be anything but Great.

This Treaty is truly intended to provide a global legal framework to remove territorial jurisdiction for anything done on a computer. They pretend to be concerned about cyberattacks when it is about collecting and sharing electronic evidence for serious crimes worldwide that will be fining or imprisoning you because you said Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni is short or she parts her hair on the right instead of the left or perhaps that she is attractive and that is perhaps a lustful statement warning you would like to rape her. This Treaty is so vague it can be twisted into whatever they want.

No doubt, those in the Biden Administration would love this to become law and to surrender our sovereignty to the UN and its World Health Organization (WHO), run by Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, who is not even a medical doctor. Tedros just declared MokeyPoxy in Africa a public health emergency of international concern. I’m sure Bill Gates has his patent vaccines all lined up for a COVID-19 sequel. Biden would love to push the blame on the World Health Organization’s declared lockdowns for the election to justify mail-in ballots all over again.

Just read the text of this Treaty. There are ZERO such safeguards for a free Internet. They will expand this to prosecute any criticism of the LGBTQ+ community anyone dares to express along with migrants as we have just witnessed in Britain. The plain, vague text allows governments to pass domestic laws that criminalize a broad range of conduct, and as long as it is committed involving a computer, they will point to this treaty to justify the enforcement of tyrannical measures. This Treaty will extinguish free speech and basic human rights for this would even overrule the American Constitution.

In the United States, we have the Sixth Amendment because the king would charge you with a crime and ship you back to England to be put on trial, where an English jury would always find you guilty. Because the alleged crime took place in America, putting you on trial in London meant you could not call a witness for your defense. This is the very same injury to human rights that the United Nations is seeking to reestablish for what the American Revolution took place.

This Treaty’s adopted text undermines domestic law for human rights safeguards on every level. Under this treaty, there will be no due process of law, which necessitates a fair notice, meaning you MUST be informed of the law to be guilty since guilt is an intentional violation of the law. If you never heard of the law, then it is impossible to have knowingly violated the law. You will be denied Due Process by the Treaty, for you will be criminally charged, extradited to some foreign land, and put on trial, which could even be the death penalty for a law you have never heard of in a faraway land.

The Constitution also prohibits Ex Post Facto laws. In other words, I make a left turn on Main Street and then the government passes an illegal law and come after me for that left turn I did a month before you enacted that law.

NOTHING in this Treaty would be deemed constitutional under ANY foundation of law. The scheme here is to prosecute you for mere speech violating some law in a distant land that would NOT be a crime in the United States.

Welcome to the ONE-WORLD government of absolute tyranny. The United Nations should be terminated and thrown out of New York City for it is seeking to overrule our Constitution. Any American who participated in this committee and agrees with this in the General Assembly is guilty of treason, violating the very oath of office they have assumed that the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land – not this terrorist organization masquerading as the champion of human rights worldwide.

Source: www.armstrongeconomics.com

Original Article: https://tapnewswire.com/2024/08/16/martin-armstrong-terminate-the-un-it-is-effectively-a-dog-and-pony-show-a-terrorist-organisation-a-de-facto-world-government/

Note: Comments placed in [ ] are added by Truth11.com editor.  For example; [Flu]

HenryMakow.com

"Top 10 Reasons to Get US Out! of the UN"

John F. McManus | JBS Bulletin Aug 2019

Are You Aware? Our nation's leaders have been working for decades to deliver the United States to the United Nations as the major step in building an UN-controlled New World Order. Each year since the founding of the UN in 1945, the conspirators for global control have taken steps that threaten to destroy the independence of our nation and the freedoms of the American people. 

1. Incompatibility of the U.S. and UN Systems of Government U.S. System: Basic rights are given by God and cannot be overruled. Freedom prevails. (See U.S. Declaration of Independence, 1776.)UN System: Basic rights are granted by the UN government and can be canceled "by law." No recognition of God. The world body lists rights it recognizes and then claims power to abolish them "by law." (See the UN's Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948, and the UN's International Covenant On Civil and Political Rights, 1966.)

2. UN Seeks to Disarm American Citizens and Cancel the Second Amendment of the U.S. ConstitutionThe UN has always sought to ban private ownership of weapons. For instance, the world body published Our Global Neighborhood in 1995, calling for "the disarming of civilians."The UN Arms Trade Treaty (adopted by the UN in 2013) would ultimately disarm Americans. It was signed by the U.S. in 2013, but has not been ratified by the U.S. Senate.

3. The UN Is a Lawless Body; It Violates Article 2 of Its Own CharterArticle 2 of the UN Charter states: "Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state [nation]...."Examples of UN violation of its own Charter include: (a) forcing U.S. citizens to cancel plans to mine gold in Montana; (b) targeting U.S. law that permits capital punishment; (c) condemning the U.S. Border Patrol for efforts to bar entry of illegal immigrants; and (d) urging independence of Puerto Rico when even the people of that U.S. possession have repeatedly indicated they don't want their relationship to the U.S. changed.

 4. Every UN Secretary-General Has Been Either a Communist or a Socialist 1945-46: Alger Hiss, Communist (United States)1946-53: Trygve Lie, Socialist (Norway)1953-61: Dag Hammarskjold, Socialist (Sweden)1962-71: U Thant, Socialist (Burma, now Myanmar)1972-81: Kurt Waldheim, Nazi Socialist (Austria)1982-91: Javier Perez de Cuellar, Socialist (Peru)1992-96: Boutros Boutros-Ghali, Socialist (Egypt)1997-06: Kofi Annan, Socialist (Ghana)2007-16: Ban Ki-moon, Socialist (South Korea)2017-     : Antonio Guterres, Communist (Portugal)

5. UN Charter's Article 25 Overrides U.S. Constitution and American Sovereignty    The complete text of Article 25 states: "The Members of the United Nations agree to accept and carry out the decisions of the [UN] Security Council in accordance with the present Charter."No President or member of Congress who has sworn a solemn oath to abide by the U.S. Constitution can permit Article 25 to dictate U.S. policy. However, most of America's elected officials believe our nation is obliged to deliver forces and arms when the UN calls for them.

6. Articles 39-51 of the UN Charter authorized the UN to direct U.S. participation in the "undeclared," "no-win" Korean War. Articles 52-54 of the UN Charter authorized creation of NATO and SEATO as UN "regional alliances," which led to U.S. involvement in "undeclared," "no-win" wars in Vietnam and Afghanistan.  Established in 1945, the UN directed the Korean War (34,000 Americans killed and 92,000 wounded). This war has never been settled.Formed in 1954, SEATO directed the Vietnam War (47,000 Americans killed and 153,000 wounded). The Vietnam War could have been won but for restrictions from on high. This war marked the first defeat in our nation's history.Congress declared neither the Korean War nor the Vietnam War as required by the U.S. Constitution. United States involvement in these two wars was due to our membership in the UN and SEATO.Established in 1949, NATO conducted the "undeclared," "no-win" war in Afghanistan from August 2003 to December 2014 as the leader of a UN-mandated coalition of 50 nations, which included the United States, and which at its height had 130,000 troops.

7. UN Leaders Oppose National Sovereignty, Favor a UN-Led World GovernmentU Thant (1970): "Lenin's ideals of peace are in line with the aims of the UN Charter."Boutros-Ghali (1992): "The time of absolute and exclusive sovereignty has passed. It's time to rethink the question of sovereignty."Kofi Annan (2000): "There must be new forms of global governance and global rules."

8. State Department Officials Bow to United Nations.Secretary of State Dean Acheson, 1949: "NATO is designed to fit precisely into the framework of the United Nations."

Above, Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, 1957: "I have never seen any proposal made for ... world government or for world federation which could not be carried out either by the United Nations or under the United Nations Charter."State Department Official Richard N. Gardner, 1974: "In short, the house of world order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down [via] an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece...."Secretary of State Colin Powell, 2001: "When it comes to our role as a member of the Security Council, we obviously are bound by UN resolutions and we're not trying to modify that."

9. Numerous Divisions of the United Nations Headquartered in Huge Buildings Throughout the World Continue to Build the UN's Power Over All of Mankind. The UN's Organizational Chart shows the presence and indicates control of the world body in the fields of education, population, children, women, environment, trade, finance, health, agriculture, labor, military, science, culture, atomic power, telecommunications, aviation, industrial development, narcotics, refugees, immigration, property rights, and more.

10. Disarmament for All – Except the United Nations. In 1961, the U.S. State Department issued a 19-page booklet entitled "Freedom From War: The U.S. Program For General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World."This document's plan, never withdrawn, called for "progressive steps" leading to UN-dominated new world order. It summarizes elements of this frightening plan as follows:(a) "States would retain only those forces and non-nuclear armaments ... required for maintaining internal order."(b) "The UN Peace Force, equipped with agreed types and quantities of armaments, would be fully functioning."(c) "The manufacture of armaments would be prohibited except for those of agreed types and quantities to be used by the UN Peace Force.... All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes."(d) The peace-keeping capabilities of the UN would be sufficiently strong ... as to assure peace ... in a disarmed world."Resistance to this hellish proposal generated by The John Birch Society over many years has led to its non-implementation. But appropriate government officials have frequently admitted that it is still the fixed and determined policy of several U.S. agencies and departments.

CONCLUSION

The United Nations is not taking over the United States. What is occurring is that the United States is being delivered to the United Nations. This delivery must be stopped. The course is clear. Withdrawal from the United Nations must be accomplished while there is still time to do so. Get US Out! of the United Nations.

Source: https://jbs.org/un/reasons/

Original Article: https://henrymakow.com/2024/08/top-10-reasons-to-get-out-of-t.html

How United Nations Funds Migrant Wave Flooding To The US

GreatGameIndia.com | January 27, 2022

The United Nations is funding a migrant wave into the US and the evidence of this is frustratingly overwhelming. Unlike other efforts of immigration into the country, this one is significantly more organized.

Bensman told Breitbart News last Monday on a reporting expedition to Tapachula, Mexico, where immigrants show up upon traversing Central America: "It is definitely organized."

They’re giving money out at way-stations up and down the [migrant] trail … There’s a process [in Tapachula]: You get your Mexican [visa] papers, then you go to the UN building next door, get an appointment, and they interview you and look at your situation…  It’s not big money, and not all of them get it, but enough get it to sustain them so they don’t have to go home, and so they can go on to the next way station.

Bensman shared a video of migrants queuing for payment on Twitter:

Original Article: https://greatgameindia.com/united-nations-funds-migrant-wave/