CAP / Brad
Interviewed this week by Fox News, former federal Minister of Agriculture Gerry Ritzbaled the hay regarding the Trudeau government’s attack on Canadian farmers.
“Ritz is fighting mad about Trudeau putting a 35% tariff on fertilizer because he believes nitrogen is a source of greenhouse gasses and we must eliminate those even if it means farmers can’t produce enough food to feed Canadians.”
The former Federal Agricultural Minister suggested Trudeau is “still festering over being thoroughly embarrassed and upstaged by the Freedom Convoy, and this assault on food is his latest volley to silence critics.”
A petty tyrant, no less. A look at historical comparisons:
“The only dictators in the modern history of the world that have deliberately reduced the food supply in the name of ideology are Joseph Stalin during the famine that starved millions of Ukrainians, and Mao Zedongduring China’s Great Leap Forward in the 1950s.”
The Ukrainian famine, known as the Holodomor claimed the lives of 3.9 million people, approximately 13 percent of the population.
“It was caused when a Dictator wanted to replace Ukraine’s small farms with state-run collectives and punish independence-minded Ukrainians who posed a threat to his totalitarian authority.”
Isn’t Justin Trudeau in fine company? “In the name of ideology” being critical to our understanding. Lacking aptitude and experience for his job, the PM grasped at the only straws on which to base his career. Thus it was that an immature ideologue came to control Canadian society. Propped up by international forces, Justin Trudeau transitioned to an automaton of woke liberal machinations.
Inverting the role of prime minister, Mr. Trudeau waged a personal brand of warfare upon an enemy state. That the state happened to be his own country has been rendered inconsequential by media.
Onward woke warrior soldiers. Canada is racist, bigoted and xenophobic. Ours is a homophobic society. Our collective history being a giant disgrace, we must prostrate ourselves and beg forgiveness.
At which point Justin Trudeau attacks Canada’s oil industry. Then, the humiliation of Canadian truckers. Followed by crackdowns on gun owners. Next, decimation of the livelihoods of Canadian farmers. Every element targeting the PM’s nemesis communities– the working class, Westerners, Christians, Conservatives.
“Justin Trudeau wants to ‘buy back’ your assault-style rifle at the same time he is destroying our food production.”
Witness as Trudeau kills two birds with one bullet:
“The perennial gun-control debate in America did not begin here. The same arguments for and against were made in the 1920s in the chaos of Germany’s Weimar Republic, which opted for gun registration. Law-abiding persons complied with the law, but the Communists and Nazis committing acts of political violence did not.”
Take away guns, starve the people. Admire Dictatorships, act like a dictator. Eliminate free speech, erode personal freedom. Brand traditional Canadians racist and homophobic.
“Trudeau has long been dismissed as an insouciant politician who is all effervescence and no substance, and what he’s doing could eventually be a crime of historical significance,” stated Canadian writer David Krayton.
All of the above, while media tacitly support his efforts. Justin Trudeau can do anything he desires, and get away with it. What a coincidence–so could Chairman Mao, Joseph Stalin and various dictators of the previous century.
“From Sunny Ways to Starvation Diets”– is this the true legacy of Canada’s communist prime minister?
Is Trudeau Pursuing A Communist-Style Canadian Land Grab?
CAP / Brad
“Liberalism built its political order on private property, consecrating it as a natural right, while Communism emerged as liberalism’s political rival and historic arch-enemy.”
Thus it is that land ownership is a defining factor in systems of governance. The socialization of property in 20th century communist regimes such as Soviet Union, China, and Cuba was fundamental for transition to authoritarianism.
Could Canada be following a similar path? Two factors define the equation: private home ownership, and the recent Liberal government crackdown on Canadian farmers.
We note an inverse relationship between the years of the Covid pandemic and housing affordability in Canada.
“Who could’ve predicted it would take a global pandemic to push the Canadian housing market into overdrive? After setting sales records across the country in 2020, 2021 saw those records toppled once more and demand remains at a fever pitch, continuing to outstrip the supply of available properties and driving prices up.”
All of it suggesting a counter-intuitive result from the worldwide pandemic. Rather than follow suit in terms of depressed business markets, home prices in Canada went through the roof.
The outcome is grim– particularly for young, first-time buyers: a recent report from Findershows that nine million Canadians, 29 per cent of the population, now classify themselves as being “forever renters,” with 35-to-44 year-olds being least hopeful.
Witness the next generation of adult Canadians being set up as renters-for-life. No private home ownership for nearly one-third of our citizenship.
“The legal presence of personal property in socialist life was a source of great trepidation for communist authorities. What they sought above all was to break free from the Liberallogic and material unfairness of private property.”
Upon which we turn to communist regimes relationship with national farmland.
A process called “Collectivisation” was a form of communist ideology applied to farmland in the former Soviet Union:
“Its essence was the demise of private family management and the creation of agricultural cooperatives, which in the Soviet Unionwere called collective farms (kolkhoz) and state farms.”
Enter Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and his fertilizer tax. In the name of the holiest of holies– climate change– the Liberals are attempting to reduce emissions from fertilizer 30% by 2030.
In response, Canadian farmers say that they may have to shrink grain output significantly at a time when the world is scrambling for more supplies. At stake is an estimated $10.4 billion that farmers could lose this decade from reduced output.
Enter foreclosure on Canadian farms, followed by federal government appropriation of the land. Is Justin Trudeau now engaging in a covert assault on private land ownership in Canada?
His hero-nations have done so. Abolition of private land ownership during Chairman Mao’s Cultural Revolution was a social standard. The same applies to Cuba’s 1959 Revolution under Fidel Castro.
Despite media obfuscation, Canada is presently experiencing a social revolution of its own. Throughout the process, a communist-oriented thread weaves its way through the social fabric:
Erosion of personal freedoms, erosion of freedom of speech, internet censorship, debt accumulation. Breach of Charter Rights(Covid), frozen bank accounts, jailed political dissidents(Tamara Lich and Pat King). Media control by government, vaccine mandates, travel restrictions, personal data tracking.
All this– and still Canadians are not getting the picture. Hear ye, hear ye– our country is transitioning its political foundation from democracy to pseudo-dictatorship.
“Under the communist revolution in the Soviet Union, the established property scheme facilitated the long-term maintenance of power and privilege. Because of the state’s monopoly on property, private institutions could not arise to challenge the regime.”
You would think Justin Trudeau had died and gone to heaven. Would this not be the deepest dream of Canada’s ersatz dictator?
“Cannot challenge the regime”— the ultimate in Trudeau-isms. We come to understand a fundamental for the erosion of freedom and democracy under Canada’s Woke Revolution:
Property is power, and our PM wants every bit of it for himself. Is Canada about to experience a systemic transition of private property from citizens to government? If it occurs, the concept is fully aligned with the tenets of communist revolution.
As is government’s control of media. On this basis, most Canadians will not perceive what their government is doing to their country. On this basis, the sky’s the limit for Canada’s transition to a pseudo-communist state.