Governments Have Directed Liability Onto Business Owners, Police and Doctors For The Covid Scam And Vaccine Genocide

Governments Have Directed Liability Onto Business Owners, Police and Doctors For The Covid Scam And Vaccine Genocide

Dylan Eleven |

Governments around the world have passed the liability for the covid operation and vaccine genocide onto business owners, police, and doctors in an attempt to escape the noose.

Covid lockdowns, social distancing, store closings, mask mandates were and are illegal. They violate our constitutional and human rights.

The government used legal linguistics to pass the actual liability of these “recommendations” onto business owners and employees who enforced them.

Governments (not the US) have also passed the liability onto police for enforcing any of the covid restrictions due to the legal frameworks our countries established with the alignments to the Rome Statute. The US is unfortunately not one of the 123  countites that signed onto the Rome Statute.  

Under the Canadian act aligning with the Rome Statute, the Crimes Against Humanity amd War Crimes Act, police are personally liable, face life in prison for human rights violations and can be personally sued.

Regarding the vaccines, as stated clearly in the Nuremberg code, doctors must provide informed consent to patients before choosing if they want to be injected with the vaccine.

And now predictably, to avoid liability the government’s are putting the blame squarely on the doctors by informing them they should have followed this procedure outlined in the code, despite if they had done so they would have been shut down and ostracized.

This legal passing of the buck will not hold up in the eyes of the people who know the truth.  

However business owners, and police are liable for their actions as doctors are for their participation in the vaccine genocide.

The following 3 articles explain these three passings of the buck further.

  1. Passing The Liability Onto Business Owmers

This is from a Canadian article link below:

...This next piece of information is by far the MOST important information for you to fully understand as a business owner. If the Federal or Provincial Governments felt that these measures were that crucial to stopping the
spread of covid-19, they would have written new federal or provincial and territorial laws for all Canadians to comply with. Period. Punishable in a court of law for breaking them.

But the government did not do this. Why not? Because these measures ARE Charter violations. Which means hypothetically:
– there would have been only ONE Federal constitutional lawsuit; or
– TEN Provincial and THREE Territorial constitutional lawsuits
In other words, these “measures” would have been dealt with quickly and efficiently in a legal challenge. Life would have returned back to pre-covid normal relatively fast.
What did they do instead?
– passed these unlawful measures down onto unsuspecting business owners
– HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS, if not MILLIONS of potential lawsuits to businesses (all across Canada) for violations to the Charter and other Acts
– including LIABILITIES for any physical or psychological injuries arising from mask-wearing and using hand sanitizers by employees or patrons
– including risk of fines, human rights complaints and being sued

From article:

2. Passing The Liability Onto Police

From This Article:

Human rights legislation is individual liability

Dylan Eleven | | Oct 9, 2021

...This article can be altered based upon the laws of your country. ... So this information is specific to Canada, but is based upon local and international laws and can easily be altered to your country by finding the laws that align your country with the Rome Convention.

These are two documents we will be referring to:

Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act

The Rome Statute

And this information is from the Iron will show:

Stewart Staudinger
Canadian and international Law, Covid-19 Measures and Vaccine Coercion
International law regarding human rights was ratified 21 years ago in Canada.
Canadian law was introduced to bring Canada in line with international law, on human rights, 7 Comventions including the Rome Statute.
Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act
Section 1
What is customary international law and what Canada signed up for. 7 Conventions including the Rome Statute.
Section 4
If you commit an act in violation of one of those customary international laws it is a criminal act in Canada. Subject to life in prison as stipulated in section 1.
The ICCPR International Law | The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Article 1.
It is illegal to remove people’s means of subsistence.
Except in a national emergency involving a direct threat to the nation. Such a s a war. Where the country is overrun by a foreign military, they could close a gas station down to move the family from the fighting near by.
That is the only exemption. Medical emergency does not qualify.
Section 13
It is not a defense to claim you were following a domestic law or order at the time of the commission of the offense.
This means if you follow a Canadian law that contravenes the one of those international laws that falls under section 4 of the crimes against humanity and war crimes act it is a criminal offense and you can’t use the domestic law or order in your defense.
So if you close someone’s business you have committed a crime medical emergencies do not count.
2. Secondly we look at specifically the vaccine mandate and forced vaccines;
The MRNA vaccines are a gene therapy and are still experimental.
Article 7 ICCPR | The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
You can NEVER Coercively or fraudulently enrol someone in a medical or scientific experiment. No exceptions. No matter what the emergency. EVER.
This current political positioning is dangerous because it puts officers in a position that they are violating the law if they back up a health agency directive, doing whatever the health agency asks X, Y or Z . But if they don’t break the law they will be fired.
We need to speak to the police individually, and find a way to get through to the command chain.
The government is not going to back off, if they do they will go to jail.
Nuremberg trials principal 4 specifically says it is not a valid defense that you were following orders. It also states people have the right to give informed consent. And they can refuse any medical treatment without consequences. Any violation of this carries the penalty of death.
The command chain knows the individual officer is liable and breaking the law. And they knowingly send them out to perform these illegal orders. They have no loyalty to the police. Wake up boys and girls in blue.
The command chain is willing to sacrifice police. They need to understand this. The police need to understand they have been put in a position that they are performing illegal acts and are personally liable. Both financially and criminally.
Human rights laws hold the individual responsible.
Resistance is a key strategy so police must excpect great resistance. Therefore police are put in the position where they are in the wrong legally, committing criminal acts that they are liable for personally, and faced with putting the population into a place where the best strategy for the people is to resist.
As history has shown, the best way to stop this genocide is to resist. For example; 25% of Leningrad was arrested one winter, if people had resisted, he would’ve run out of agents in a week.
Police need to be told that they are breaking the law, human rights law, Canadian law and international law. They have no legal defence. They are personally liable, criminally and financially. The penalty for violating section 4 of the crimes against Humanity and war crimes act, as stated in section 1, is life in prison.
If a police officer breaks the law and violates section 4 of the crimes against humanity and war crimes act. For example; shutting down someone’s business, giving out fines specifically for COVID-19 measures, or trying to coerce anyone to have a vaccination, based upon the international law, and Canadian law the have committed a criminal act subject to life in prison.
The process to hold police accountable is:

  1. File a criminal complaint at the police station under section 4 of the crimes against humanity act. This is a serious offense.
  2. File a complaint with the human rights commission
  3. For fines and shutting down of business you can hold them personally responsible for financial losses file a civil suit against them for criminal damages and you can put a lien on their house and their car etc.
    We should not be having to hold the police accountable for breaking the law.
    But if faced with police, making them aware that we can hold them accountable, and their actions are illegal, may deter them from fining you, or closing down your business, or violating your human rights.
    Police should not do any job or follow any order that deeply immoral and is in violation of Canadian or international law. They have the right to refuse these orders and if they get fired for it they could sue.
    Another group of people we need to tell they are liable, and face a life sentence, is local government.
    They are responsible for your area personally also. If violations of section 4 happen under their watch they are responsible and liable financially and criminally, facing a life sentence as stated in section 1.
    If these local government officials know what the law is and if it comes to trial, they will come for the town counsellors. And they are liable. The town can then tell the police, you’re on your own with these illegal orders, and they do not have the back up from the town.
    The process that should be done is a lawyer at the government level, talking to the cabinet, to the health minister, to the Premier, the solicitor General and the justice minister; and say “this is illegal, these people (the police) work for us (some crown corporation AHS or something) they are not going to break the law on our watch and on our turf. Over to you solicitor General”….
    At which point the solicitor General, sends out a letter to the heads of the crown corporation or private corporation saying you do not get to enforce these illegal mandates, fines and closures in people and you cannot coerce or fraudulently enroll them in a medical or scientific experiment ever.
    Human rights legislation is individual liability. There is no such thing as corporate liability.
    No one can turn around and sue the crown corporation such as AHS, who run the police, for closing down your business or violating human rights. This is key:
    The people responsible are;
  4. The person who made the decision,
  5. The person that gave the order
  6. The person that carried out the order.
    They are all legally liable for their illegal actions, not the corporation they work for.
    I bet if they fully understood that they have every legal right to stand with the people and refuse illegal orders That go against not only against the Canadian Constitution, the Nuremberg code and the crimes against humanity amd war crimes act. They would feel better about organizing within the ranks and challenging the chain of command to not put them in that position.
    Vaccine mandates in the workplace you can also go after these people personally for losses due to the vaccine mandate.
    In addition to the crimes against humanity and war crimes act there is the Nuremberg Code, and other laws. We Will put them all in one place a new PDF and put this out soon.
    If we all do what is suggested in this video. Tell all cops and politicians they are personally liable for breaking the law and face life in prison.
    Also tell them we understand the position they have been put in, but we are all being put in that position so out sympathy is limited.
    They are not allowed to break the law. And if they do we will hold them accountable.
    I think many more would join with the people if they know they are breaking the law, have no defence, and are personally liable.

3. Passing The Liability Onto Doctors

Austrian Health Minister and Medical Profession Dispute Responsibility for Massive Covid ‘Vaccine’ Deaths and Health Damage

LewRockwell  /  Paul Craig Roberts

In Austria the massive harm done to human life and health done by the Covid “vaccines” has resulted in the Austrian Minister of Health shifting responsibility to doctors who betrayed their medical responsibility to inform patients of the risks of the vaccine.

Of course, had doctors done so, they would have been punished for “spreading misinformation.” It was the Austrian government that tried to mandate coercive vaccination of every Austrian.

In truth, the “Covid pandemic” was an exercise in massive disinformation by “health authorities,” aka marketing agents for Big Pharma, incompetent, mindless politicians, and a whore media that lied through its teeth and continues to do so.

Now that the Austrian Health Minister has shifted responsibility to medical doctors, how much longer can the utterly corrupt US “public health system” deny that there are massive “vaccine” injuries?

Original Article: