Analysis of a single drop of the Pfizer “vaccine”

Europe Reloaded / Pam Barker

Notes and observations on the video:

Using a single drop or so of the Pfizer vaccine that’s been heated, a truckload of graphene oxide-based, artificial structures appear under highly magnified conditions. Yet there are zero biologic ingredients, no genetic material, no mRNA. It’s basically nanotechnology of the self-assembling type. There are tubular graphene structures that can be used for technology in neurological networks, for connecting up neurons in the brain. These structures can absorb radiation (heat) to be stimulated within the brain. This is the intersection of neuroscience and nanotechnology. There are other forms of graphene present, too. They appear to act in almost an intentional manner under the microscope as they move along with other particles in a particular direction.
The La Quinta Columna team from Spain has done a lot of independent work on discovering these artificial structures in the vaccines, yet they have been under considerable attack. Names such as Robert Malone and Ryan Cole are mentioned, implied to be shills diverting the narrative. We can only agree with him. The so-called ‘health freedom movement’ has many shills under its umbrella, it seems, and one of its functions has been to steer the conversation away from these artificial graphene structures, talking instead about mRNA, spike proteins, blood clots, etc. Biostatistician Ricardo Delgado notes how such people generally justify not doing their own microscope analysis as being a ‘waste of time’. Recently, Dr. Ryan Cole did one of these bravura performances where he took Del Bigtree (no less, wide exposure) into his lab to show microscopic analysis of vaccines and blood. When he found a square-looking structure, he had a ready explanation for it being something else – a cholesterol crystal. Here is this video.

Back in the studio, Bigtree addresses a flat two-dimensional looking structure at the 9th minute as being typical of what one may find under the microscope, but Cole brushes it off as a cholesterol crystal. Sadly, Bigtree lets him get away with this. Such people carry clout. At 16:03 in the La Quinta Columna video, Delgado references Cole’s ‘crystal’ without naming him. What Delgado shows us are very long, thin tubular structures. Hardly a squarish ‘crystal’.
What jumped out at us were the names Delgado quoted, who hardly get any traction. Such as Canadian Dr. Daniel Nagase. These researchers have come to the same conclusions as La Quinta Columna team, that there are only artificial technological structures in the vaccines, yet we hardly hear from them in the medical truth movement. Why? This strikes us as very odd. The overnight truther, Dr. Robert Malone, for example, who ‘saw the light’ after allegedly suffering from 2 Covid vaccines, is suing Dr. Peter Breggin and Dr. Jane Ruby for a cool 25 million dollars each. Dr. Simone Gold has been shown up as a shill of the first order. Aren’t they all on the same team?
Delgado confirms that ‘squencing’ a so-called virus, done with the aid of algorithms in a virtual way, isn’t the same as physically isolating it. They may derive a tiny bit of a genetic sample from something, a microscopic part, but then the rest is projected or invented to create this ‘sequence’.
Delgado unusually shows a lot of impatience and anger in this video, which we frankly feel is justified, calling out critics in various sectors, including Spanish media.
This vaccine technology, Delgado claims, is BASED ON graphene oxide pure and simple and the structures made from it.
The microscope slides in the video are worth looking at even if the spoken Spanish or the written French are not familiar. Check this one out, produced we repeat from within a single drop of the vaccine and exposed to some heat:

Delgado reminds us that his team have looked at 400 samples so far with more than 1,000 viewing hours under the microscope, so they will ‘take lessons from no-one’.
Towards the end of the video, he reveals that UV radiation/light on the graphene structures inside the body REDUCE them, and in that way they are then able to cross the blood-brain barrier and be placed within the neurones. Such reduction may take place when we’re travelling under certain conditions on public transport, for example.

Analysis of a single drop of the Pfizer “vaccine” on December 26, 2022

VIA PROFESSION GENDARME

#English – Analysis of a single drop of the Pfizer “vaccine” on December 26, 2022. Graphene-based carbon nanotubes, graphene microfilaments, graphene sheets, all in a single drop. There is no mRNA in the vaccine. What it contains is not organic.

Collaborates with La Quinta Columna: https://www.laquintacolumna.info/colabora-con-la-quinta-columna/

Marie De Plume

“SINGLE DROP ANALYSIS OF PFIZER “VACCINE” ON DECEMBER 26, 2022. GRAPHENE-BASED CARBON NANOTUBES, GRAPHENE MICROFILAMENTS, GRAPHENE SHEETS, ALL IN ONE DROP. THERE IS NO mRNA IN THE VACCINE. WHAT IT CONTAINS IS NOT ORGANIC. –

Excerpts from the transcript:

“It’s all about technology. It’s not organic. The latest research by Dr. Nagase, Juan Garberi and also Lorena Diblasi shows that neither phosphorus, nor hydrogen, nor nitrogen are present in the sample; therefore, the basic atoms of life do not exist. THERE IS NO GENETIC MATERIAL either. THERE IS NOT THE mRNA PLATFORM AS SUCH. Mr. Malone is probably another IMPOSTER.
[…]
THE FAMOUS LIPID NANOPARTICLES, WE WERE TOLD, OF THE PFIZER VACCINE. OF COURSE, “WE FOUND THE PATENT OF LIPID NANOPARTICLES AND THEY HAVE TWO GRAPHENE SIDES”. YOU UNDERSTAND IT NOW [THIS IS A LIE], DO YOU NOT? BEYOND, IT WON’T STAY LIKE THIS. I SAY THIS TO ALL THOSE WHO HAVE LIED AND CONTINUE TO LIE. WHAT YOU ARE PROTECTING TODAY IS YOUR BEHIND. BUT WE WILL CHASE YOU IN THE STREET. IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER, AT QUINTA COLUMNA, WE DECREE THAT THESE PEOPLE, WHO HAVE FLAGRANTLY LIED, ARE ENEMIES AND CRIMINALS FOR ALL HUMANITY, WHO HAVE NOT OR SHOULD NOT HAVE THE CAPACITY TO LIVE EVEN IN OUR WORLD, LESS THAN GO OUT ON THE STREET.
[…]
See here how this formation is driven by a small point. They are single-walled carbon nanotubes with a more elaborate shape. This is graphene arranged geometrically in a tubular fashion. It is used in the field of neuroscience as branches or neural networks. What it will do is make connections between one neuron and another. And from there, since this material absorbs radiation, the phenomenon of neuromodulation and neurostimulation becomes possible, and being able to modify certain areas of the brain to obtain certain moods and behaviors within the population. It’s not science fiction, it’s science, neuroscience and nanotechnology that go hand in hand here.
[…]
IT IS ALSO NECESSARY TO COUNT ON THE COMPLICITY OF A SERIES OF INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE POSITIONED AS DISSIDENTS IN GROUPS CALLING FOR THE TRUTH. NOT ALL WHO WERE PART OF THESE GROUPS, MOST HAD GOOD INTENTIONS. BUT THEIR LEADERS WERE ORIENTED TOWARDS CERTAIN SOURCES AND INTERPRETATIONS, LIKE CERTAIN NON-EXISTING PROTEINS, OR THE OFFICIAL VERSION OF A BIOLOGICAL PATHOGEN AGENT LIKE SARS-COV-2, ETC. THESE ARE PEOPLE WHO ARE REALLY PART OF THE OFFICIAL IDEOLOGY, AND WHO THE RULING PARTY SENDS TO THE FRONT LINE TO FIGHT DIRECTLY THE REAL DISSIDENTS ON THE POINT OF FINDING OUT EXACTLY WHAT IS IN THE INJECTIONS. I SPEAK OF FAMOUS GROUPS FOR THE TRUTH, DOCTORS FOR THE TRUTH, BIOLOGISTS FOR THE TRUTH. FALSE DISSIDENTS. CRIMINALS SENT DIRECTLY BY THE PRO-GOVERNMENTAL POLITICAL FORCES TO FIGHT THE EVIDENCE FACED WITH THEIR TRUE DISINFORMATION. THEY ARE KEEPERS OF THE TRUTH, PRECISELY TO ALLOW TO CONCEAL THE INTRODUCTION OF THE [NEURONAL] INTERFACE. REMEMBER THERE IS PLENTY OF MONEY HERE – AS MUCH AS THEY WANT AND MORE – JUST TO HIDE, HIDE AND HIDE. Moreover, these people distinguished themselves throughout this period, I am talking about the famous collectives for truth, telling everyone that the analyzes we were doing were not valid, when they did not did absolutely no analysis, and directly discredited ours or even made accusations, personal messages, direct threats and complaints against me and Dr. Sevillano, or at Dr. Campra himself. However, over time, I can say and I promise that you will be pursued practically until eternity.

This is also the watchword at the Quinta Columna: that the criminals pay directly. Whether they end up hanged in a public place or right where they really deserve it, in prison. Another of their ideas was that the analysis of the vaccine was a waste of time, they told the dissident medium. You had to read the papers, which were precisely those of the version spewed from above. they said to the dissident milieu.
[…] We have the direct source of information. There is no middleman. Well right now you’re looking at the microscope, aren’t you, Dr. Ryan Cole and Mrs. Natalia Prego? We are not only interested in the damage, but also in what causes the damage. (…) IN EFFECT, YOU ARE TRAITORS TO THE HUMAN SPECIES. WE DON’T KNOW WHAT THEY PROMISED YOU EXCEPT MONEY AND FUNDING. (…) A SERIES OF CHARACTERS HAVE APPEARED IN OUR COUNTRY AND IN OTHER PARTS OF THE WORLD AS WELL, TO HELP CALL SECTS ALL THOSE WHO PROVIDE EVIDENCE. IN THE END, YOU WILL ALSO BE PERSECUTED, NOT ONLY BY QUINTA COLUMNA, BUT BY ALL HUMANITY YOU HAVE BETRAYED.
[…]
Someone comments: ‘an article has been published which says that in Barcelona they have sequenced the virus.’ How did they do it? Indeed, with computer methods, which does not mean… Sequencing does not mean isolation. The isolation is physical. That is to say, I introduced the pathogen into an urn, in a culture broth if it is bacterial, I have it there, in situ. The sequencing is virtual using computer algorithms. They take a lettuce seed, and from there, genetic information which is usually a tiny amount of less than 1%. They extrapolate, that is, they make up the rest, okay? Therefore, do not confuse sequencing with isolation. Neither with characterization, nor isolation, nor purification, and even less with respect for Koch’s postulates, which consists in introducing it and seeing that it is responsible for the disease. Logically, they’re not going to introduce anything because they haven’t isolated, as I said, the real pathogen, and they never will either.
And besides, the images that appear in the media, on official television, are CGI, that is to say images made with a computer. Remember that saying things clearly and loudly is not synonymous with giving in, let alone cowardice. In this case, it’s being a bit brave. But regardless, TRUTH IS PROTECTION AND SHELTER FOR THOSE OF US WHO DEFEND IT AND WE WILL CONTINUE TO DO SO. IT IS MAINTAINED OVER TIME. THE LIE HAS THE CONSEQUENCE THAT AT SOME TIME IT CAN BETRAY YOU. WHAT WILL ACTUALLY HAPPEN TO THESE PEOPLE.
[…]
When you look through the microscope and you examine one of those vials called vaccine, when you see one of them, then dare to mention La Quinta Columna, in the meantime, wash your mouth out with water from Bleach if necessary. You keep talking about climate change and all this series of antics to keep the system warm, which is the one that directly provides you with a comfortable cushion, although it also kills you with sclerosis, because you suffer from multiple sclerosis. We will see it precisely in one of the news, which precisely, is also a consequence of the radiations. But you tell us Don Bruno, have hope. You have hope that the new mRNA platform has made progress in its scientistic pseudoscience to fight sclerosis, whereas THE FAMOUS mRNA PLATFORM DOES NOT EXIST AS SUCH. THIS IS ONLY A GRAPHENE-BASED NANOTECHNOLOGY. (…) BUT THE ‘SCIENCE’, IN QUOTATIONS, THAT YOU DEFEND IS JUST MADE FOR NAIVES, HUH? NOT ONLY ARE YOU PROTECTING THE SYSTEM, BUT YOU ARE ALSO FANING YOUR OWN DEATH.
[…]
More graphene filaments. Now we have a view, say a low magnification panorama, only 100 magnifications. And these are single-walled carbon nanotubes, used in neuroscience as neural networks. Here is a larger overview. Look what happens. We observe a single drop, not ten drops, nor four or five. A single drop of half a square centimeter under the Haxon Aquiles II optical microscope, a high-end microscope, but it would be visible even with a low-end microscope. The camera is the H-Aptina 5.0. (…) Well, what is it? Telephony? It’s incredible. Here, fortunately or unfortunately, we no longer know how to say it, we normalize the fact of seeing this in injections. WE HAVE ALREADY REVIEWED OVER 400 INJECTABLE PRODUCTS. WE HAVE MORE THAN 1000 HOURS OF OBSERVATION WITH OPTICAL MICROSCOPY, SO WE DO NOT ACCEPT LESSONS FROM ANYBODY. NO MATTER THE NUMBER OF DIPLOMAS THEY ADD, EXACTLY THE DIPLOMAS ARE ONLY FOR THE BIG TITLES, BUT NOTHING MORE. »
[…]

Source: the fifth column.info

Original Article: https://www.europereloaded.com/analysis-of-a-single-drop-of-the-pfizer-vaccine-on-december-26-2022/